Oil tanker traffic is on the rise, increasing the risks of shipping accidents and major oil spills in the Salish Sea. Notably, tanker traffic that is exporting Canadian tar sands crude could increase by 956 transits per year.
That’s almost three new oil tanker transits per day.
A New Canadian Pipeline Would Increase Crude Oil Exports by 1 Million Barrels Per Day
Canada is fast-tracking a new pipeline from Alberta to the west coast to export an additional 1 million barrels per day (bpd) of tar sands crude oil via oil tankers. The pipeline would terminate in northern British Columbia or at Roberts Bank (Port of Vancouver) in the Salish Sea.
Canada has put forth a plan to expedite permitting for major projects, including this and other pipelines, ports, and transportation infrastructure, that puts endangered species and marine ecosystems at risk.
This is especially concerning for the critically endangered Southern Resident killer whales – a population that is made up of 74 individuals and that has been struggling to successfully reproduce over the last decade due to environmental threats including ship strikes, pollution, and climate change.
Friends estimates an additional 730 oil tanker transits per year through the Salish Sea from this pipeline project alone, based on the assumption that this pipeline will be able to load one Suezmax oil tanker per day.
More Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansions
In May 2024, the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion project was completed, increasing export capacity from 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 890,000 bpd. Canada is now proposing an additional pipeline expansion, to 1.19 million bpd. The expansion would include dredging 25,000 cubic meters (m3) of sediments to accommodate larger ships, exposing marine habitats to contaminants lodged in the dredged material. The expansion would also include increasing throughput by 60,000 bpd in Trans Mountain’s Puget Sound pipeline that delivers tar sands crude oil to Washington’s four northern refineries: BP Cherry Point, Phillips 66, HF Sinclair, and Marathon Petroleum.

According to the Washington Department of Ecology, the pipeline already poses a risk to the Salish Sea because it crosses the Nooksack River twice, the Samish River, Swinomish Channel, and many creeks along the east side of Padilla Bay. In addition to disrupting these watersheds, enhanced throughput for the Trans Mountain Pipeline puts sensitive marine and coastal ecosystems at risk as transshipment exports through the Salish Sea are projected to increase along with pipeline capacity.
Impacts from Canadian Crude Oil Exports
A major tar sands crude oil spill from these project expansions would be catastrophic.
Canada’s tar sands contain some of the world’s largest crude oil reserves. Extracting the bitumen—a heavy, sticky form of crude oil found in sand and clay deposits—requires large amounts of heat or chemical diluents, making its life‑cycle emissions roughly 15–30% higher than conventional oil. Research has also shown that actual pollutant emissions of crude oil extraction can far exceed reported levels, intensifying climate and air‑quality impacts, while increasing marine and aquatic contamination.
The extraction process produces toxic tailings stored in vast ponds that leak into surrounding ecosystems, affecting groundwater, wildlife, and the health and food sources that communities rely on. Once diluted, the bitumen—also known as dilbit—is transported through pipelines, where it is loaded onto oil tankers that use the Salish Sea as an export route.
An increase in oil tanker traffic would increase the risk of a major spill, which would cause economic, cultural, and ecological losses that would extend across generations. The repeated re-suspension of submerged and sunken oil could re-expose ecosystems over time, and oil residues can remain in sediments, shoreline, and benthic habitats for years to decades, continually releasing toxins. Marine species from shellfish to salmon to orcas would face population-level impacts. This new pipeline proposal and further expansions of the Trans Mountain pipeline could result in long-lasting and cumulative climate, ecological, economic, and cultural impacts.
A 2014 United States Coast Guard report on diluted bitumen oil spills addressed the uncertainty of behavior, compounded by the volatile and toxic chemicals that are mixed with bitumen, which complicates spill response. “The initial portion of an oil sand product response would emphasize minimizing public and responder hazards from light VOCs [volatile organic compounds] that would volatize in the first several hours/days of the event.” According to a 2022 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report, the behavior of a major diluted bitumen oil spill in marine waters is still unknown.
How Friends is Addressing this Threat
Canada’s New Crude Oil Pipeline
With the recent announcement that Canada is fast-tracking a new crude oil pipeline from Alberta to the west coast, Friends is helping to rally opposition of this pipeline to protect the Salish Sea and all that rely on this fragile ecosystem.
In June 2026, Friends submitted a comment letter to the Clerk of the Privy Council and the Secretary to the Cabinet of Canada asking Canada to maintain the integrity of its Species at Risk Act (SARA) when permitting for projects that impact crude oil exports through the Salish Sea.
Trans Mountain Pipeline
Friends of the San Juans’ opposition to the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion project and its increase in oil tanker traffic in the Salish Sea dates back to 2014 when our first comment letter was sent to Canada’s National Energy Board (NEB) in response to the proposed expansion from 300,000 bpd to 890,000 bpd. Friends documented impacts to the transboundary Salish Sea, including communities in Washington State, from the expansion’s increase in oil tanker traffic and the associated increase in accident and oil spill risk.
Throughout the permitting process, Friends provided outreach to our members, the public, and elected officials educating them about the environmental risks and impacts of the expansion, encouraging them to submit their own comments to Canada’s NEB opposing the project.
As the project escalated, Friends signed onto a comment letter sent by Washington State Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations (ENGOs) to U.S. members of Congress that regularly engage in bilateral consultations with Canada expressing concerns with the Trans Mountain Expansion Project.
In March 2026, Friends of the San Juans was joined by 12 nongovernmental organizations that work in Washington State on environmental and public health and safety issues in submitting comments opposing the proposed Burrard Inlet dredging project that would significantly expand Trans Mountain exports throughout the Salish Sea.
Friends is monitoring and engaging in all permitting related to the expansion of Trans Mountain’s Puget Sound pipeline. Friends submitted comments with five Washington State environmental and public health organizations on a recent application submitted by Trans Mountain to the Northwest Clean Air Agency. Trans Mountain recently withdrew that permit application. Friends also submitted comments on another Puget Sound pipeline project in 2024.
Friends is tracking the expansion of Canadian tar sands crude oil exports and is dedicated to leveraging all available resources to limit increases in oil tanker traffic and oil spill risks in the Salish Sea.
How You Can Help
Please join us in taking action by asking Washington State and Congressional representatives to oppose the proposed pipeline’s route to the Salish Sea and to urge Canada to retain endangered species protections in the permitting of major projects. The new pipeline route is expected to be announced by July 1, 2026, so please don’t hesitate to reach out to your elected officials today!
Additional Information
- Friends of the San Juans’ Comment Letter on upholding protections for endangered species in Canada
- Friends of the San Juans’ Comment Letter Opposing the Second Narrows (Burrard Inlet) Dredging Project
- ENGO 2026 and 2024 Comments Related to the Proposed Expansion of Trans Mountain’s Puget Sound Pipeline
- Friends of the San Juans’ 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline Comment Letter and Associated Materials sent to Canada’s National Energy Board
- Canada’s Proposed Permitting Reforms to Expedite Major Projects
- Canada’s Push for a New Crude Oil Pipeline
- History of the Trans Mountain Pipeline

